Do you think that the federal government ought to have offered money or land to former slaves?

I believe they should have offered land.

Explanation:

Sadly this never happened in the United States but I believe that land would have been a better choice because at the time of the Emancipation Proclamation land would have had more value for them. At the time how were they going to be able to provide for themselves with Jim Crow laws and sharecropping so prevalent in the South. Land would have made the community much more independent and able to advance the social ladder.

i dont know. sorry : (

3. republican abraham lincoln

4. south carolina

5. charleston, south carolina

6. confederates

7. minie bullet - made defense even safer, it spun faster, traveled further and was five times more accurate than any single-man weapon. able to kill at half a mile, it was the largest contributor to battle wounds

      or the the gatling gun - the most successful of several rapid-fire guns that were born before the war. its efficiency in killing only made war more deadly.

idk which one u learned about. pick one.

8. the south was fighting to maintain its way of life, whereas the north was fighting to maintain a union. so they had will, and the north were fighing on unfamiliar territory

9. union had the large population, people to fight in the war and work in the factories to make war materials, industrial base, the factories to make these war materials. the union also was wealthier than the confederacy and could finance the war.

10. stonewall jackson

11. chancellorsville

12. gettysburg

13. sherman

some of these might be wrong but i tried my best.   : )