Which analysis do you find more persuasive, Kennan's or Lippmann's? Why?

Analysis by Walter Lippmann.

Explanation:

And if Kennan's analysis has exciting details that can inspire the reader to think, Lippmann is right in saying that he was influenced by Marxist ideas when drafting his report. We can add too little in this context. Kennan focused mainly on criticizing the foreign policy of the United States, which had to be rigid as it became a state with centuries-old claims to various territories of Europe, especially those in the east of the continent. These efforts were intensified, especially after the end of World War II. Therefore, Lippman's statement that the Soviet claim to Eastern Europe is an innate imperial ambition, not a communist doctrine, is a fascinating thesis that can be seriously debated.

d. migration

the industrial revolution pushed the world into modern industrialization. it changed the course of history profoundly. it caused rapid urbanization and pushed cities and countries into development. the industrial revolution began in great britain with a series with new inventions which led to the creation of machines and mass production.

this caused the country to gain wealth and money and become an international superpower. it improved transportation and manufacturing inside the country, pushed people to live in urban areas and britain to become the most powerful nation in the world for a while.