History, 10.04.2020 00:46 Jonah58

Why were the camp David accords seem as a win during his presidency?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

The Camp David Accords were a pair of political agreements signed by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin on 17 September 1978, following twelve days of secret negotiations at Camp David, the country retreat of the President of the United States in Maryland. The two framework agreements were signed at the White House and were witnessed by President Jimmy Carter. The second of these frameworks led directly to the 1979 Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty. Due to the agreement, Sadat and Begin received the shared 1978 Nobel Peace Prize. The first framework, which dealt with the Palestinian territories, was written without participation of the Palestinians and was condemned by the United Nations.

Explanation:

Answer from: Quest

hernan cortes;

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 16:00

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 18:30

The california gold rush: actually had only a small impact on california’s population because its rich farmlands already attracted thousands of new settlers each year. attracted almost equal numbers of men and women. resulted in laws that discriminated against “foreign miners.” made considerable wealth for average miners because gold mining demanded no real investment of capital. hurt the development of san francisco because gold discoveries shifted interest to areas outside of town.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:30

Were the terms of the treaty of versailles reasonable?

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 22:30

14. (05.05 mc) question refers to the excerpt below. "to each head of a family, one-quarter of a section; to each single person over eighteen years of age, one-eighth of a section; to each orphan child under eighteen years of age, one-eighth of a section; and to each other single person under eighteen years now living, or who may be born prior to the date of the order of the president directing an allotment of the lands embraced in any reservation, one-sixteenth of a section."—from the dawes act, 1887 how did the disbursement of land through the dawes act differ from previous agreements between the government and american indians? (5 points) the dawes act broke up lands into smaller plots for individuals, but earlier acts gave larger tracts to entire tribes. previous acts granted land only to heads of families, but the dawes act also distributed lands to single people and children. the dawes act distributed lands previously designated as reservations, whereas earlier agreements had only included new lands. previous lands had been distributed only through presidential order, whereas the dawes act was passed by congress.