subject
History, 09.04.2020 21:58 xeno777

The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'
right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school
district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the
case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the
students.
Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the
Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands
to school?
A. The school allowed students to wear other controversial symbols.
O
B. The armbands were shown to cause disruption that interfered with
learning.
C. The use of judicial review shows flaws in the majority opinion.
D. Other court cases upheld the rights of schools to limit freedom of
expression

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:20
When benito muslini came into power he promised to
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
The american civil war most former enslaved african americans in texas began making a living as
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
How did the king kanissa’ai become very rich
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which statement best explains why a supreme court opinion is a seminal document? an opinion can become quite lengthy, which makes it a seminal document. supreme court documents are the only seminal documents in the united states. an opinion may create major changes in the laws or policies of the united states. generally speaking, a supreme court opinion reflects the feelings of all americans.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from...
Questions
question
Biology, 13.01.2020 00:31
Questions on the website: 13722367