History, 08.04.2020 23:49 reyesmtz5414

1. What is the old folk belief on
which this cartoon is based?
2. How is the British Empire
represented in the cartoon?
3. What is the date of the cartoon and what historical event triggered it?
4. What is Gandhi's relationship with the lion? Does Gandhi regard the British as "the enemy"?
5. How does this document illustrate Gandhi's nonviolent tactics for achieving political change?
6. What is the source of the document? Does this indicate that Gandhi's tactics for achieving greater
freedom for India are enjoying some success?

1. What is the old folk belief on which this cartoon is based? 2. How is the British Empire represen

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: trippynarco

This cartoon was presented in Britain in response to Mahatma Gandhi's Dandi march.

Explanation:

1. The cartoon is based on the folklore of British that the devil salts the tail of the beast to make it worse.

2. The British empire is represented as hapless in the cartoon.

3. The cartoon is from 1930 and the Dandi march of Gandhi which broke the salt law and made Indian people make their own salt triggered it.

4. Gandhi regards the British as the enemy of the people of India and Lion is the empire.

5. Gandhi was successful in riling up the crowd and making the people of the nation go against imperialism.

6. The struggle of Gandhi led to considerable success as India was to win its independence shortly after.

Answer from: Quest

which colony was founded, in part, as a place for english debtors?

a) georgia

Answer from: Quest

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 19:30

Question 1 (1 point) five score years ago, a great american, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the emancipation proclamation. this momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. it came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity. but one hundred years later, the negro still is not free. one hundred years later, the life of the negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. one hundred years later, the negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. one hundred years later, the negro is still languished in the corners of american society and finds himself an exile in his own land. and so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition. in the first paragraph of this passage, which literary technique does mlk use? question 1 options: a. this is an example of personification because it compares segregation to being in chains. b. this is an example of hyperbole because it gives it gives human characteristics to segregation. c. this is an example of allusion because it references the language used in the emancipation proclamation, which freed slaves in 1863, 100 years before this speech was presented. d. this is an example of onomatopoeia because he uses the words seared and withering to describe the injustices experienced by african americans.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 23:10

Which of following most accurately describes china today?

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 01:30

Which british law required americans to house and feed british troops? sugar and molasses actstamp actnavigation actsquartering act

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 03:00

How was the method of making pottery by using coils of clay better than simply shaping the clay by hand? it prevented pottery from cracking when fired. it created a watertight seal. it produced more attractive pottery. the pottery could be cut or stamped with designs.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

1. What is the old folk belief on
which this cartoon is based?
2. How is the British Emp...

Questions