Removal of the capitalist system of the economy. Lenin is one of the ideologues of this idea, which he elaborated on the available sources. The model of government and governance created by the revolution has been taken up as a value system in individual countries—the current system of economic values that is in place today in most countries of the world. The capitalist economy is a characteristic of democratic states, the command link to socialist regimes. There are several fundamental differences between the two systems.
Explanation:
The idea of a world revolution can be defined as a movement for the fight for workers' rights and the liberation of workers from capitalist exploitation by the bourgeoisie. The idea was formed to overthrow the current capitalist regime and to create a new one in which the distribution of goods would be more equal. The idea is close to certain socialist beliefs. The concept also applies to specific revolutionary movements that were current in Europe at the end of the eighteenth century and throughout much of the nineteenth century.From the document of the former Soviet leader Lenin. Namely, in his work on the states and revolutions that took place in 1917, Lenin emphasized the need for the working class to stand for better rights. Lenin calls for a rebellion and fights against the current State of workers in the country. Lenin also points out that revolution is a necessity and that this is the only way to remedy the situation.The revolution in Russia has had some international reflection. The system of government is assumed as a pattern of governance in individual political systems in the world. In this context, we can cite Socialist Yugoslavia, although the governance model was a little lighter than was the case in Russia. Some historians see the reflection of the revolution in Russia as a negative phenomenon. This implies a reduction in foreign trade and complete control of the ruling party over the domestic economy. Then the monopoly of power, the prevention of the tripartition of power, the state terror and the army responsible for the party.A capitalist economy is a system in which capital, land, and other means of production are subject to trade flows, and profit after tax is distributed to owners. The rest of the country invests in the development of industry, transfers to various funds and invests in the event of new technologies. Such a system of the economic organization rests on several postulates in the first place, that is, private ownership, then directing the economic activity to profit-making, the market as a regulator of action, as well as the appropriation of profit by the owners of capital and finally the work of people as free actors who sell their knowledge on the market. And abilities.Former socialist states, with the USSR in the lead, to "protect" their people from the alleged "destructive" effect of market elements, anarchy and spontaneity. This form of economy is called command economy and is characteristic of a socialist state. On the other hand, the capitalist economy is typical of democratic systems of government where the flow of economic developments is much more liberal. The State does not have the absolute ownership of financial flows, but it does require the right to a certain percentage.The difference is enormous; these are two political systems that are opposite. The Soviet Union fostered the rigid political doctrine of communism. The form of communism developed in the Soviet Union is close to dictatorship and totalitarian political regimes. The economy, industry and all life-flows were under the direct control of the system. Under these circumstances, fundamental human rights, such as the right to opinion, freedom, were violated, and the media also controlled the regime and the media. Communism in the Soviet Union has often carried out the repression of all political dissenters and citizens for whom there was minimal doubt about any action that was not in line with the principles of the regime. The democracy in force in the united states today is the complete opposite of all of the above. The country's economic flows are much more liberal. The basic principles of democracy and human freedoms are also respected. The media is independent of political parties. The political system is multiparty, unlike the one in the Soviet Union where only one political option was present.
