subject
History, 27.03.2020 08:01 savannahvargas512

Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents v. Bakke angered people on both sides of the affirmative action debate? The Court issued a two-part decision that struck down some parts of affirmative action while upholding other parts. The Court issued a two-part decision that struck down use of affirmative action in medical school admissions only. The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in California but not in other states. The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in college and medical school admissions only.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
4. any area in which one nation has power over another; i.e. - this happened to china when it was defeated by japan
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Match each person with his contribution. aristotle socrates eratosthenes hippocrates he studied the causes of illnesses in search of cures. he created a teaching method that involved asking questions. he determined that earth was round. he educated alexander the great.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
How did aristotle describe life for most athenians in the 6th century bc?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:40
The law of increasing costs states that as a country produces less of one product and more of another, there is an increase in the resources needed to expand production of the second product.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents v. Bakke angered people on both side...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 09.09.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 09.09.2021 23:10
question
English, 09.09.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 09.09.2021 23:10
Questions on the website: 13722367