Summarize Machiavellian view of humans

As for human nature, Machiavelli is under no illusions: it is p/erverse, cruel and treacherous, and anyone who seeks power must accept this fact. In order not to be betrayed, the ruler must believe that everyone is a traitor and, before being loved, he must be feared.

Machievalli is a modern thinker. It means that he did not hold medieval view on human nature. He was absolutely aware of unethical (unethical or amoral from the perspective of Christian morality) aspect of human nature. Humans have their ethical principles, but in fact their own nature is much more different and sometimes he/she can follow amoral principles (from the Christian point of view) and his/her actions can be effective. So, to be effective sometimes it is necessary to be unethical. This is a pure pragmatism that is required in politics. In this respect Machiavelli is a modern thinker.

Explanation: Machiavelli was quite ahead of his time, because he did not work with exaggerated ideals (Christian concept of human being contains exaggerated criterions for human behaviour). Politics and morals do not go hand in hand.

whats the question? im not quite understanding your question.

answer: i looked it up

explanation: in 1955 in montgomery, alabama, a girl refused to give up her seat on a public bus. the girl was black, and the passenger looking to take her seat was white. this is a familiar tale, but it's not about rosa parks. the girl in the story is a 15-year-old high school student named claudette colvin, and this act of defiance occurred nine months before rosa parks did the same thing. colvin was arrested, and her case is what led to the u.s. supreme court's order for the desegregation of alabama's bus system. so, why don't we know colvin's name? "later i had a child born out of wedlock; i became pregnant when i was 16," colvin says. "and i didn't fit the image either, of, you know, someone they would want to show off.