How far a government should
go to protect society? Identify
some of the reasons for and
against the Japanese
exclusion policy. Discuss the
impact this policy had on the
lives of Japanese Americans.
Make connections to present-
day issues we are facing and
the governmental response.

The government has ideally a huge role to play in accepting the immigrants and not make an exclusive policy to alienate them.

Explanation: The reasons for coming up with the Japanese exclusion policy which the agitators felt that they were short changed and the Japanese were considered economic competitors.

The protest came up with unbelievable labels against the Japanese immigrants such as being unsuitable, criminality etc. The inflammatory speeches of calling the Japanese degenerate. This was compelled by the fears of racial mixing would contaminate the white populace.

There was also the rage of the attack on the pacific west coast and they were now addressed as the 'yellow peril'. The exclusionists were successful in bringing so many laws against the Japanese

  There were a few who took a stand for the Japanese immigrants and they themselves took it upon themselves to educate the masses of about inclusion of multi-ethnicity. but it fell short when the final nail of Immigration Act which was passed for all the Asians and it was what the exclusionist fought over several decades.    

The policy had a very bad impact on the Japanese Americans, it hampered their growth and their children were not allowed to be enrolled in  public schools. They could not purchase land in states across US. they were removed from homes, businesses and also communities.  

Once again we can see the same sentiment rise its ugly head again with the anti-Chinese propaganda that is being manifested. It is slowly but penetrating into the psyche of the Americans to boycott the Chinese who they think have taken up the jobs meant for the white Americans.

The government at present has added fuel  to the fire and remained passive to curb the anti-Chinese or anti-Asian sentiments.

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

the correct answers are the following

a proxy war which functioned as a training field for wwii

republican democratic goverment

national side, leaded by the fascist general franco

the spanish civil war took place between 1936 and 1939 and was fought after a military coup undertaken on the 17th july 1936 by a group of generals that had seceeded from the spanish republican army, under the leadership of general franco, and who aimed to expel the democractically-elected republican goverment from power.

this war became a proxy war in which european powers tested their military equipment. on one side, urss and mexico supported the left-wing republican spanish goverment, while nazi germany and fascist italy supported the national fascist side.

franco managed to win the war in 1939, with the significant contribution of the foreign military support, and became the dictator of spain until his death in 1975.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!