Members of traditional communities in countries where the state is either weak or absent depend on consanguineal and affinal relatives to help meet the basic challenges of survival. In such traditional societies, why would it be risky to choose marriage partners exclusively on the basis of romantic love? Can you imagine other factors playing a role if the long-term survival of your community is at stake?

It would be risky to choose marriage partners exclusively based on romantic love since your partner may not have enough money to survive.

Other factors that could play a role if the long term survival of my community is at stake are natural resources, and a good strategy from the government to manage them and the economy.

Explanation:

In traditional communities would be risky to choose a partner exclusively based on romantic love because your partner or you may not have enough money to survive as there is no help from the state to live in good conditions.

Other factors that could play a role if the long term survival of my community is at stake are the responsible management of natural resources so that everybody has access to them and in a way where the environment is not affected. To do this, the state should be present and have a good economy plan where all the members of the community can survive and live in decent conditions.

i think the answer would happen to be the letter b

because the bar never runs out

couples always argue

30 and 44 are b

explanation: