How are the beginnings of the French and Indian War different from those of the American Revolutionary War?

A..The American Revolut

ionary War was started because of a land dispute between France and America. The French and Indian War was started because of America becoming independent.

B...The American Revolutionary War was started because the American colonies wanted independence from Britain. The French and Indian War was started because of a land dispute between Britain and France.

C...The American Revolutionary War was started because of a land dispute between Britain and America. The French and Indian War was started because of a land dispute between France and the Native Americans.

D...The American Revolutionary War was started by the British. The French and Indian War was started by the Native Americans.

The American Revolutionary war was started because the American colonies wanted independence from Britain. The French and Indian War was started because of a land dispute between Britain and France ( B )

Explanation:

The American revolutionary war was a war fought by the American colonies against the British rule because the American populace under the British colonies wanted Independence from the British and this freedom struggle led to the American revolutionary war. some Americans supported the British forces in fighting against the American forces during the American Revolutionary war.

while the French and Indian wars were mainly caused/started because of land dispute. this war was between British America and new France. the British forces wanted to expel the French from Territories that they occupied in North America and also they wanted to claim the Ohio river valley. in a bid to occupy them.

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

i would go with the last one