subject
History, 28.01.2020 10:31 Elency

The magna carta required the king (as executive) to be bound by law. which of these statements best reflects how this idea applies to the u. s. bill of rights? . a. the government is not above the law and the will of the people. b. people are better off without a government, but it is necessary for society. c. the congress has greater authority than the president. d. in case of a conflict, the states overrule the federal government.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
What is the difference between direct learning and indirect learning? a. direct learning is independent learning that people pursue on their own. indirect learning is forced on the learner by others, such as parents or teachers. b. direct learning is forced on learners so that they'll become productive members of society. indirect learning is a voluntary action taken by the learner with the intention of becoming a productive member of society. c. when people learn culture directly, they are imitating and observing others. when people learn culture indirectly, they are being taught by someone else. d. when people learn culture directly, they are being taught by someone else. when people learn culture indirectly, they are learning through observation and imitation.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Cuneiform was invented in which religion? mesoamerica egypt indus mesopotamia
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:50
Gupta kings believed the strict social order of the hindu caste system would strengthen their rule. which of the following responses to this statement is most logical? a. the guptas’ highest priority was preserving their power. b. the guptas’ highest priority was restoring personal freedoms. c. the guptas’ highest priority was spreading the hindu religion. d. the guptas’ highest priority was changing the roles of women.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:00
Rule of law analysis template name:date: 
 read each scenario and answer the questions that follow. scenario 1 local law defines the speed limit as 45 miles per hour on local roads. the law outlines punishments by charging fines for those who drive faster than the speed limit. signs post this law on most roads. local police stop a man traveling 67 miles per hour. he apologizes and says he did not see a speed limit sign. the officer gave him a ticket and told him he will have to appear in court since he was going so fast. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? determine the purpose of the law. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentences.what could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.scenario 2 state law recognizes that every vehicle has a title or legal document that names the owner of the vehicle. the state also recognizes financial agreements between people who have lent or borrowed money a woman decided to sell her car to her friend. her friend did not have enough money to pay for the car. the woman made a financial agreement with her friend. she agreed to accept payments until all the money for the car was paid. the woman gave the car title to her friend, with the friend now listed as the owner. her friend made no payments on the car. the woman wants her money or the car back. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? determine the purpose of the law. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentenceswhat could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.scenario 3 federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast information that could threaten the security of the. however, the constitution protects the right to free expression of ideas. judges use past decisions on cases where the law and rights come into conflict to settle similar disputes. a reporter for a national news program is accused of breaking the law. the reporter wrote an article that disapproves of a new federal policy. u.s. officials say the article is unfair and too negative. they say it could upset people and lead some to break laws in protest. the reporter says that news writers have the right to free expression under the constitution. the reporter also says that the article does not promote unlawful action. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? determine the purpose of the. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentences.what could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The magna carta required the king (as executive) to be bound by law. which of these statements best...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722362