How did the fear of communism impact nativism? (APUSH Guided Reading)

The fear of communism that impacted on navism was as result of the fear the nativist has about the communist taking over their country based on the spread it was having after the WW 11 and also to protect their culture being doctored by the immigrants.

Explanation:

The fear of Communism impacts on Nativism because the nativist does not want the immigrant to come and establish any form of communism in their country.

Communism which was a system of government in which the community owns and controls all resources and run by a dictator while Nativism is seen as a system that type of policy that is set up to protect and preserve the native interest against that of immigrants.

However, in explaining the fear of Communism that impacted Nativism, we talk about steps that were set up to protect the immigrant from entering the United State after WW 11. The nativist drafted different political policies which help to support the immigrant restriction.

The fear was also raised because they believe if they allow immigrant, they might come and forming groups which will later transform into communism based on the fact that communism was spreading all over after the civil war.

Communist ideology has left a strong influence on people.

Explanation:

Communism is an ideology strongly imbued with indoctrination. This setting left a substantial impact on many peoples, where this political system was in place. A sense of attachment to communism and today is evident in many countries. In the former Yugoslavia, where a more liberal version of communism was in place, it still arouses nostalgia among the elderly. The sense of attachment to ideology is still present in many walks of life today.

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.