How did the Supreme Court majority argue that "separate but equal" facilities were legal? Check all that
apply.
It was said to help preserve the peace and public order.
It was not really enforced on a day-to-day basis.
It allegedly affected only people with a criminal record.
The Constitution did not protect social rights, only civil and political rights.

answer; ///i believe that the correct answer is (a); ///the crystal will

its true: ) hope this

the correct answer is “opportunity cost”. opportunity cost is what a company misses out because it decided in one option over another one. in this case, the company decided to invest in building a factory so it gave up another possible benefit or profit in order to achieve success with the factory.  

trade-off is not the correct answer since it is a situation in which you accept losing something in return for benefits in other areas.

and finally, consequence is a general term used to accept what it comes when you make a decision. it can be a positive or negative consequence depending if the decision you took was the correct one.  

a forgein bfvgrebdfkx