Which amendment did the Supreme Court cite in Dred Scott v. Sandford?

A. The first amendment (protection against losing property without due process)

B. The first amendment (the right to free speech)

C. The second amendment (the right to bear arms)

The Ammendement the Supreme Court cited in Dred Scott Vs. Standford is the Fifth Amendment (Due Process Clause) which forbids the federal government from freeing slaves brought into federal territories.

Explanation:

In 1867, the Dred Scott Vs. Stanford was before the Supreme Court, in which Dred Scott (a black slave) appealed the decision of the U.S federal court to the Supreme Court. The U.S federal court had ruled against him, where they applied the Missouri law to the dispute.

However, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment and suit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Supreme court cited the following:

1. Persons of African descent cannot be, nor were ever intended to be, citizens under the U.S. Const. Plaintiff is without standing to file a suit.

2. The Property Clause is only applicable to lands possessed at the time of ratification (1787). As such, Congress cannot ban slavery in the territories. Missouri Compromise is unconstitutional.

3. Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the federal government from freeing slaves brought into federal territories.

It was A the 5th amendment

Explanation:

i just got it right edge 2020

the book of ezekiel takes its title from the priest of the same name, son to a man named buzi. ezekiel’s priestly lineage shines through in his prophetic ministry; he often concerned himself with topics such as the temple, the priesthood, the glory of the lord, and the sacrificial system.

explanation: mark brainliesrt i am trying to get to the next level                                                                                                       i will be your freind and

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]