subject
History, 19.02.2020 20:24 sloane50

Why were most Southern Democrats, like South Carolina's Strom Thurmond, in opposition to the civil rights acts of the
and early 1960s?
Allowing more rights for minorities was in opposition to Jim Crow policies
and traditions enacted and maintained by many Southern Democrats and
the party's supporters.
According to most Southern Democrats of the time, the civil rights acts of
the late 1950s and early-1960s did not do enough to protect the voting
rights of minorities.
Allowing more rights for minorities would require a change to the method
of choosing the President, since the Electoral College never included
voting rights for minorities.
According to most Southern Democrats of the time, any civil rights act
would require more research, work, and cost by the national government
every ten years during a census.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:50
The term globalization is best defined as: a. a reduction in the political and military power of imperial countries over their colonies. b. an increasing interaction among citizens and businesses of countries around the world. c. the spread of philosophies based on the right of all nations to political independence. d. the establishment of international laws protecting all people's human and civil rights.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
In 1819, what did the united states obtain from spain for $5 million?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Brainliesttt !me : ) what brought about the end of the soviet union?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
What were the effects of the great reform act of 1832?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why were most Southern Democrats, like South Carolina's Strom Thurmond, in opposition to the civil r...
Questions
question
History, 21.07.2019 21:30
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2019 21:30
Questions on the website: 13722363