Historians overestimate the destruction caused by World War II. Though large cities were devastated, small farming towns were mostly untouched. In fact, most European farmers were barely aware that the war was happening at all.
Which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draws a valid conclusion?

A) Determine how many battles during World War II took place near small farming towns.

B) Identify which countries formed alliances with one another during WWII.

C) Watch historians footage of bombings that destroyed large European urban centers.

D) Accuse the essay writer of being biased against people who live is small towns.

Determine how many battles during World War II took place near small farming towns.

Option A.

Explanation:

World War II, otherwise called the Second World War, was a worldwide war that kept going from 1939 to 1945. Most by far of the world's nations including all the incredible forces—in the long run shaped two restricting military coalitions: the Allies and the Axis.

Driving subjects remember the political takeover for 1933 of Germany by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, which savagely advanced a forceful international strategy infringing upon the Versailles Treaty of 1919, Japanese militarism against China, Italian hostility against Ethiopia, and the achievement of Germany.

polling is a process and the outcome is not involved in the process itself.

the outcome, which is an unfavorable rating for a particular candidate is not affected by the mechanical process of polling.

it rather depends on the number of people voting in favor of the candidate.

this is an outcome of people's preferences.

look ongoog you might find it