In the debate leading up to the war of 1812 who were the Warhawks

The War Hawks were members of Congress who put the focus on President James Madison to proclaim war against Britain in 1812.

Explanation:

The War Hawks would, in general, be more youthful congressmen from southern and western states. Their longing for war was incited by expansionist propensities. They needed war with both Britain and France, however, the hatred toward Britain was more grounded: British boats came back to their strategy of impressment, by which they would hold onto American mariners and power them to serve in the British naval force.

Many saw the entire clash as a pointless one, produced by James Madison and his Republican Party to advance their own political advantages. The pioneer of this gathering was Speaker of the House Henry Clay of Kentucky. John C. Calhoun of South Carolina was another prominent War Hawk.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

john f. kennedy purpose was to make his argument a strong appeal to emotion in order to make an impact and connection to american citizens. he want to achieve peace by telling the citizens they shouldn't be afraid of other nations.

explanation: