Imagine you are the jury spokesperson assigned to tell bostonians the verdict that you and your fellow jurors reached. your written explanation of the verdict should contain the following:

one paragraph explaining the events leading up to the boston massacre

one paragraph describing the boston massacre and stating the decision the jury has reached

one paragraph explaining how the jury reached the verdict, including:
two pieces of evidence from the testimonies
an explanation of how each piece of evidence supports the verdict

Plz ? ? 20 points for this question ! hhjc6

Which type of local government is expressed in this map of georgia?

My latest book, fightin’, prose short fiction, is a combination. there’s nothing about being indian in there. just stories of people. why shouldn’t i write about non-indians? i don’t have to dress anybody in feathers." how does ortiz's use of language in this excerpt set an informal tone? a. by using contractions and sentence fragments, ortiz makes this part of the interview feel more familiar and casual. c. by using the term "indian" rather than "native american," ortiz makes this part of the interview feel more combative or hostile. b. by employing first-person pronouns, ortiz makes this part of the interview more solemn and pessimistic. d. by asking a rhetorical question, ortiz makes this part of the interview objectively and intentionally funny and lighthearted.