list three ways the roman republic was different from a monarchy ruled by a single king. use what you learned about the structure of the roman government earlier in the lesson.

A) Roman Republic was unable to control the vast empire while the monarchy could easily control the empire. B) There was a proper division of power between the different organisation which were assemblies of the government but there could be hardly two classification in the imperial age. C) Dictators could control the situation of emergency while the republic could not.

Explanation:

Roman republic was like democracy in Rome where the power was divided into assemblies. There were three assemblies in which the power could be divided to govern the country. But these were very slow in taking the decision and therefore could not handle the emergency situations very easily.

On the other hand, when there was only one emperor or dictator, it was very easy to control the power and the empire. Since the decision had to be taken by only one person, it could be taken very easily and could manage the emergency situations. This was the time when Rome was ruled by only one ruler and was known as the imperial age.

mesopotamian code of hammurabi

and i think its 1860 b.c. you mean lol