subject
History, 22.12.2019 07:31 4tazaouiamine1r

Charles evans hughes said dissenting opinions were “an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day.” what did he mean? a. justices who dissent are less intelligent than the majority of the court. b. justices who dissent are considering the precedents set by past decisions. c. justices who dissent often feel angry about how the majority of the court interprets the law. d. justices who dissent may think that future generations will see the issue differently.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
How does an oligarchy conflict with democratic principles
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
Concord tv: did the media show any bias while covering the concord city election? explain your response. your response
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which economic sector employs the least number of people in mexico, barbados, and venezuela? a. agriculture b. services c. industry
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Why was there so little resistance in the war from the german people?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Charles evans hughes said dissenting opinions were “an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to...
Questions
question
Health, 12.10.2020 21:01
question
Mathematics, 12.10.2020 21:01
Questions on the website: 13722367