Which shape could you use to describe the structure of social classes in early civilizations
a. circle
b. square
c. triangle
d. pyramid
any will be nice : )
btw this is for history

The pyramid is the best to shape to show the class system. Because from tip of pyramid to end of it we can sort the classes in early civilization.

Option: (D)

Explanation:

The social class in early civilization is divided into three major class:

The elites

These are those who are having money and reputation among society. They usually are kings, earls, dukes, and prince. Or in India, there are kshatriyas(kings and princes).

The middle class

These include traders, nobles, etc. In India, there are Brahmins who were for giving knowledge.

The lower class

Slaves, peasants, untouchables all poor people come under this class. They had no rights and no freedom. They got all the works of elite people. They don’t had their own land for farming. They worked as land slave.

Of course it could have been avoided. a great many scholars argue it happened because of truman's use of fear to gain support. his predecessor fdr was the most popular and charismatic president ever. truman was a machine politician chosen as the least offensive choice around for vp. had henry wallace remained vp and then president, the cold war might not have happened. or had dewey been defeated in the primaries by robert taft, and then taft defeated truman in 48, the cold war also might not have happened. taft was somewhat isolationist, opposing nato and the korean war. wallace believed truman to be unnecessarily provocative in his dealings with the soviets.of course for strong anti communists, they claim the soviets would see any sign of weakness and try to take over the world. but this is a conspiracy theory not backed by evidence. most communist movements were local and not controlled by moscow. stalin had just lost over 20 million people and was exhausted and paranoid. his number one fear was a rearmed germany allied with the us, and truman made his nightmare real with the marshall plan. truman's blunders are at least half responsible for the cold war and neither wallace nor taft would have made them.on top of that, stalin was dying and in poor health. his successor khrushchev was a reformer who ended the forced labor camps, set many political prisoners free, criticized stalin, and declined to build a powerful soviet navy to confront the us. stalin actually proposed a neutral united germany. a paranoid american gov't turned him down, guaranteeing a continued cold war for decades more.