Which statement would a judicial activist most likely make?
a-“interpretations of the constitution must change because its authors could not foresee modern life.”
b-“the court must protect the constitution from changes that distort its original meaning.”
c-“government should exercise only those powers specifically named within the constitution.”
d-“the supreme court must evaluate laws according to the literal language of the constitution.”

“Interpretations of the Constitution must change because its authors could not foresee modern life” (A).

Explanation:

In the democratic system, laws are drafted by the legislature, so that the primary function of the judiciary is to ensure that the laws and the Constitution are complied with and respected. In the conservative view, the Constitution must be fulfilled literally in order to avoid distorted interpretations and to ensure that the government acts only as outlined in the Constitution.

However, there is one aspect that suggests that the reading of the Constitution can generate different perceptions, so that it is feasible to be interpreted. Thus, in interpreting the Constitution, judges of the Supreme Court can establish jurisprudence for topics that the legislature has not yet discussed or that avoids discussing. In addition, other judges may also use an interpretation of the Constitution in judging its causes. This is called judicial activism. One justification for judicial activism is exactly what is described in item (A), that the historical period that the Constitution was written in 1787 was very different from the present moment, so that it was not possible for constituents to predict situations contemporary, therefore, lacks interpretation.

i think i agree because it is telling you to always believe in yourself.