Was the boston tea party a civil disobedience

Yes.

Explanation:

The partakers were refusing to pay tea taxes. They were disobeying the law and caused a uprising.  They were unhappy.

"Civil disobedience can be defined as action taken by individuals to illustrate their dissatisfaction with certain laws or rules as a peaceful demonstration. It could be in the form of refusal to comply with certain policies or refusal to pay certain fines."  

brainliest is someone you pick by simply clicking a button. it only shows up if there are two people that answered your question, then you decide who answer more accurately with detail and explanation and you give that person the title "brainliest".

i hope this your understandings.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.