African nations and leaders were purposely left out of the berlin conference in 1884-1885. should leaders of african nations been included in the conference? yes or no? why or why not? how could the inclusion of african leaders made a difference in european imperialist history?

Yes, they should, because they were the most affected by this.

They could decide their future, and not to be led in Europeans hands.

It was a sharing Africa, this event formalized the neo-colonialism that resulted in the extensive economic exploitation of African colonies by European countries.

the right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful.  " the  participant in european imperialism is being described below is that  their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful. 

it was bribing i think i might be wrong though