Why did hacibes argue tratatizers should for a social contract with their government
citizens would be able to have increased ibery
citizens would be able to engage in thather countries
citizens would be able to work individually without any support
citizens would be able to form governments that ensure their interests

Hacibes argue tratatizers should for a social contract with their government because Citizens would be able to form governments that ensure their interests.

Option D

Explanation:

The social contract is a model or progress that concerns the government authority over the state and the individual in the state. Its main concept is that people are surrendering themselves to the politicians during the elections by electing them as their leader.  In turn, the politicians will provide them freedom, protection for their rights and to maintain social order.

This concept was known as the state of nature by Thomas Hobbes. According to Hobbes, if the government failed to protect the people and their rights or not satisfying them, then people can stop obeying them. Also, they can change the people they've elected as a leader through the election and other means like violence.

honestly i love the walking dead, mainly the quotes. “well, pardon me young man, excuse the [insert bad word here] out of my gosh darn french, but did you just threaten me? ” sksk (of course it's not the exact words)

1. yes it was the new deal introduced lots of regulations to workers, such as the national labour relations act of 1935 which workers to form unions and protected the members from other laws as well as forcing businesses to listen to the unions and their workers

2.the new deal had a lot of great ideas. but when fdr created the national industrial recovery act. they set prizes and work hours for the workers. the workers made more money ($.40 rather than $.20) but because they did not work as much they would end up making less money. after a while the supreme court found this act to be un-constitutional. but sense the people weren’t   making as much money they could not afford the products. even though the new deal was taken away in 1939 because the government became to powerful, there are still remnants of it in our government. national labor relations, social security, etc… the new deal alone did not end the depression but it the u.s.a dramatically and set them on the right track to recover and become the powerhouse of a country it is today.

3. yes it did bring some relief to those who were willing and able to work and it assisted in terms of creating new and strengthening existing infrastructure.  

4.