Ill give brainlist also 20 points
role of the dictator analyze the role of the dictator in the roman republic. write an opinion piece that answers the following questions. what are the benefits and risks of having a leader with total control during war? do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Answer:

The risks of having one ruler that controls everything in the country definitely overrules its advantages.

Explanation:

During the republican phase of Rome, the empire was under the control of a dictator who was known as the magistrate. The dictator’s reign usually lasted for over six months, during which he has complete authority to take military, and the opportunities for people to veto his actions were very limited.

Having a single ruler in the case of wars can have several disadvantages, for instance all decisions are initiated by the leader, regardless of his people’s opinion. This may lead to an unwanted war for personal benefits and cause several losses, as well as a possibility of the people turning against their ruler.

On the other hand, having one leader can minimises the probability of having multiple decisions, which may lead to internal conflicts in the same government. From what is previously mentioned, the risks of having one ruler that controls everything in the country definitely overrules its advantages.

im not sure its either a leader of a group of congresspeople or a person from a congressmans district

sorry im not sure