What statements best articulates a noninterventionist argument against american imperialism
a-the us is obligated to intervene in foreign nations
b-american expansion exploits the people’s of other nations
c-the us is obligated to share christianity and american values
d-the use of force to obtain military bases in other countries is justified

The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''

Option B

Explanation:

The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.

Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.

abraham lincoln, according to anyone who was connected with agriculture, represented the worst of northern politicians. shortly after lincoln was elected, south carolina seceded from the union. they along with other southern states, retained their anger. in a way, it was their own fault: the democrats were split in the south. some wanted slavery to be extended in other states that were about to join the union and some didn't want it badly enough. lincoln had a solid backing from his party: the republicans were united in not wanting slavery to be expanded.

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.