Will give braniliest

this is an excerpt from the website world war i by high school student alexia dengbai :
i believe world war i was the most destructive war in history. millions were killed or injured, and cities were destroyed. people suffered greatly. there could never again be a war as destructive as world war i. that is why people called it the ''war to end all wars.''

which statement about the credibility of this source is most accurate ?

a. the source is credible because it contains more facts than opinions.
b. the source is not credible because it contains more opinions than facts.
c. the source is credible because the author is an expert on world war i.
d. the source is not credible because it does not contain the date of the war.

I believe the answer is B

Explanation:

First of all, it says “I believe” and this indicates and opinion. Another opinion is “there could never be a war as destructive as World War I”. Also, this text does not provide any citation or sources.

This is why this source cannot be credible :)

hope I helped,

please mark me as brainliest  

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this