Ahistorian is writing a book about india's fight for independence from the
british empire. he claims that the movement was successful mostly because
of its nonviolent tactics,
what is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is
valid?

i think the answer is c, rivers.

explanation:

sometimes, borders fall along natural boundaries like rivers or mountain ranges. for example, the boundary between france and spain follows the crest of the pyrenees mountains. for part of its length, the boundary between the united states and mexico follows a river called the rio grande. the borders of four countries divide africa’s lake chad: niger, chad, cameroon, and nigeria.

keeping a cash reserve because cash flow is the the movement of money through a company and if it just sits there, it wont the movement

the pogroms became known as kristallnacht, the "night of shattered glass," for the shattered glass from the store windows that littered the streets. the morning after the pogroms 30,000 german jewish men were arrested for the "crime" of being jewish and sent to concentration camps, where hundreds of them perished.

the puritans were a group of people who grew discontent in the church of england the common unity strengthened the community.