Write an essay explaining how both ghandi in “on violent resistance” and thoreau in “civil disobedience” use rhetorical strategies to achieve a common rhetorical purpose. (4 paragraphs are fine-body for each author, two or three examples each body paragraph, well-explained

comparison is that they aren't nationalistic. a dif is that sds is government approved movemnet while yaf isnt \

it isnt that hard

explanation:

by killing the americans thats what i would say

it might be to see if the person answering knows what they are talking about other than just saying, "its b hope this ! : )" because they could say it then get the wrong answer because they only answered for the points.