Both sides appealed to the connecticut supreme court, which upheld all fifteen takings in a close 4–3 decision. the majority ruled that almost any public benefit counts as a “public use” under the state and federal constitutions, and that courts must generally defer to government planners. –“the story behind kelo v. city of new london,” ilia somin which statement best summarizes the ruling of the connecticut supreme court? the property could not be considered for public use. the property could be seized only if the city could prove the community would benefit. the government had the right to seize the property for virtually any public use. the government did not have the right to condemn the property.

i think the answer would happen to be the letter b

because the bar never runs out

couples always argue

he is known for discovering   the fossil of a female hominin australopithecine   known as "lucy" in the afar triangle region of hadar, ethiopia.

hope this !

have a great day!

the correct answer option is: weapons.

explanation:

tensions rose as the two opposing superpowers competed for 'weapons'.

referring to the cold war (1945-1991), the two superpowers, usa and ussr, experienced a phase of struggle and conflict with each other. these two superpowers considered each other as a threat to their survival and thus opted for policies to strengthen their positions.

the two superpowers never went to war with each other directly but competed for weapons to preserve their positions.

the answer is "focused on"

lol gave an answer 1 week that's the answer for those who need it in the future xd