I'm having trouble picking between two answers

read this excerpt from abraham lincoln's second inaugural address, delivered on april 10, 1865.

with malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as god gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan -- to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.
which sentence correctly uses lincoln's ideas and avoids plagiarism?

a. as he said in his address, it was the nation's job to strive on to finish the work we are in. (second inaugural)

b. he believed in creating a just, and a lasting peace within the united states and with all nations. (lincoln)

c. he felt as though the people of america had a duty to "care for those who were born in battle" (lincoln).

d. he did not wish to punish or exact revenge on the confederate states, but instead wanted "to bind up the nation's wound" and heal the country (lincoln).

do u wanna me in my question and ill do your question?

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

what do you mean