Need . me! .
in a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the federalists and the anti-federalists at the constitutional convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.

Put this in your own words this isn't the full answer but a few things that will really help you

Explanation:

The Federalists and the Anti-federalists were the first major political parties in the United States. The Anti-federalists were known as the Democratic-Republican Party, today called Democrat. Both of these groups were political parties in the early days of our country under the Constitution. But both parties had different believes and went for different causes. Both were supportive of our new country. They had different visions of how the country should operate.

The Federalists believed in having a strong federal government, to support the people. They believed one of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government lacked power. The Federalists believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution where the power would all be equal, just like today, with the government it's all in stages that can approve and decline things the other stage of our government wants, keeping everything at an equal peace. A loose interpretation would allow the federal government to do many things not specifically listed in the Constitution. The Federalists supported Hamilton’s debt plan and the development of a national bank. The Anti-federalists or Democrats wanted to opposite

the answer is heceta and bodega y quadra. i hope i you with this question!