Which of the following best explains the u. s. supreme court decision in bush v. gore?

decided that florida’s first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and bush was the winner.

decided that the florida supreme court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and bush was the winner.

c)) it decided that the florida supreme court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the constitution.
d)) it decided that florida’s first recount was against the constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.

the correct answer is “opportunity cost”. opportunity cost is what a company misses out because it decided in one option over another one. in this case, the company decided to invest in building a factory so it gave up another possible benefit or profit in order to achieve success with the factory.  

trade-off is not the correct answer since it is a situation in which you accept losing something in return for benefits in other areas.

and finally, consequence is a general term used to accept what it comes when you make a decision. it can be a positive or negative consequence depending if the decision you took was the correct one.  

our former president bush did 9/11

the reduction of citizens’ rights

also known as the bill of rights