subject
History, 06.09.2019 21:10 ofmiceandkj1

What is one strategy a historian can use to determine whether a piece of
evidence is accurate?
o
a. simplifying it to make it easier to understand
o
b. interpreting it according to his or her point of view
o
c. changing it to better suit a particular claim
o
d. corroborating it with other pieces of evidence

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
How could a works-cited list a reader determine whether to believe the claims you make in an essay? a. by synthesizing your conclusions into a simple objective summary o b. by proving that your claims are supported with credible evidence ) c. by allowing you to make claims without quoting other writers o d. by providing a clear organizational structure to your essay
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which is proper hierarchy or leadership roles in the senate from lowest to highest
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
How is an objective summary different from an argumentative essay? o a. a summary should remain neutral, but an argumentative essay should promote a certain viewpoint. o b. a summary should use direct quotations, but an argumentative essay should paraphrase evidence. o c. a summary should include a works-cited list, but an argumentative essay should not cite others' work. o d. a summary should focus on a thesis, but an argumentative essay should address many different topics.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Do you think the cartoonist has a positive or negative view of bryan? why?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What is one strategy a historian can use to determine whether a piece of
evidence is accurate?...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 08:30
question
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 08:30
Questions on the website: 13722363