The historian in the passage is most clearly demonstrating which historical
thinking skill?

You didn't give any passage, but I will help you as better as I can.

A historian can use several thinking skills to analyze a historical problem. However, the common ones are:

Explanation:

Now, let's understand each one:

Historical causation - the ability to analyze multiple events and situations in historical periods and found a common point, relations, and approaches. In a nutshell, it's to look at History and analyze the events as a connection of facts.

Continuity or rupture - this ability is related to the historical process of beginning and ending. In a nutshell, something begins in a period, ends in the other.

Periodization - this one is related to the process to create a logic historical timeline. To arrange the events according to their moment in history, connecting with the subsequent event.

Comparison and contextualization - is the process to look at society, event or people in History and understand them as individuals with their ideals and dynamics (contextualization), but at the same time, trying to understand the differences between a historical moment to another (comparison).

Historical argumentation - is the ability to look at a historical process, understand it and to create a solid argument. In many ways, this ability is developed alongside the others. For example, a historian studying the Maya civilization. With a deeply analyze supply by the other points, he can see the society, religion, economic and political issues about the Mayans and write about them.

before there were tanks, machine guns, windmills, and solar panels, the first civilizations emerged that create the history of humanity which provided the larger context for western civilization. uses of weaponry and technology were used very differently in the ancient civilizations than they are today. relating back to the times of the ancient mesopotamian civilization, technology kept advancing throughout the ancient egyptian civilization into the ancient greek civilization, and then finally the ancient roman civilization. as techniques and strategies were past down from civilization to civilization, each shared its own similarities, as well as varied differences. one trait they had in common was to commit violence and economically overpower one another. technology has ultimately advanced due to the knowledge transferred from generation to generation. uses of sophisticated weaponry and devices have created more opportunity for warfare and improvement in the work place. ancient civilizations became more powerful due to the advancements of technology. technology did not only create the use of violence, but it also the economies grow and become stronger, because production of trading goods rose like never before. the rivers, such as the nile, tigris, and euphrates all flourished, as well as destructed civilizations. each civilization had different uses for these rivers, however, some benefited more than others. when analyzing ancient civilizations, there   are things you must understand

explanation:

congress also has implied powers, which derive from the necessary and proper clause of the constitution and permit congress "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the united states.