The supreme court ruling in mapp v. ohio (1961) dealt with what amendment to the constitution? second amendment fourth amendment first amendment fifth amendment

Fourth Amendment

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruling in Mapp v. Ohio (1961) dealt with the fourth mendment amendment to the Constitution. They ruled that, any evidence found with a search without a warrant may not be used.

Fourth Amendment

Explanation:

The case Mapp v. Ohio was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court decided that evidence that violated the Fourth Amendment could not be used in criminal prosecutions, at both the federal and the state level. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. It also sets the necessary requirements for issuing warrants.

explanation:

i have ni idea

1) the andrew carniage's purchase and renovation of skibo castle have been very good and auspicious for the local people of dornoch firth, scotland because this is a turistic attraction for many people who would want to know the castle, the local people would take advantage about this.

2) yes, it could.