subject
History, 21.11.2019 04:31 asims13

Considering the historian's use of source material which interpretation is
most valid?
a: a historian cites a series of secret cartoons drawn while germany
occupied france during world war ii in order to draw conclusions
about an underground resistance movement.
b: a historian uses a book written about world war ii in order to draw
conclusions about how the french were treated by german
soldiers
c: a historian uses an unidentified painting created in france during
world war il in order to draw conclusions about the attitudes of
french citizens
d: a historian cites a 2012 blog post written by a german citizen in
order to draw conclusions about the fear the french felt during
world war il

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
How were castas paintings used to stabilize a society?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Why was the treaty of versailles harsh on germany?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Aclaim about history is most likely not valid if it has which of these characteristics?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
What did the puritans form to establish their own new world colony?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Considering the historian's use of source material which interpretation is
most valid?
...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 21:20
question
Biology, 06.11.2020 21:20
question
World Languages, 06.11.2020 21:20
question
Chemistry, 06.11.2020 21:20
Questions on the website: 13722367