Henry h. amringe commented in reaction to the 1850 women’s rights convention. women in europe may fill the throne, as reigning monarchs. shall they who are thought worthy of the highest station, in hereditary monarchies, be deemed unworthy of election to office, by the suffrages of a free people? if women, placed in the administration of great and vast national affairs, by the mere accident of birth, have acted wisely, much more might we expect not wisdom only, but integrity in the government of women, selected by free citizens, with a view to mental and moral fitness. short-answer questions where did henry amringe make these comments? what argument does amringe give to support his views?

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.

anybody wanna play fortnite?

i believe out of the choices it is a.

the effects of the french revolution had a major impact on france and europe, which influenced and transformed these countries. about.com explains that the effects of the french revolution resulted in an established democratic institution, elections, constitutions and a modern government. these effects changed laws and the hierarchy of power.

according to about.com, the long-term effects of the french revolution were profound on humanity and society. the effects of the french revolution secured political and economic gains for the lower class. the french revolution shaped politics, religion and beliefs. it developed liberalism and eliminated traditional laws. the effects included counter-reaction tactics, which defeated napoleon and produced totalitarianism ideals.