One of the women talking to marzynski and zbyszek in the united states asks whether zbyszek can be objective in writing the story of bransk because he is not jewish. this brings them to the question of who should write the history of the town and/or the holocaust. who do you think is best able to write the history of the holocaust? why?

answer; i believe the above statement is (true);

the china one is last

explanation:

yes he can but hardly

explanation:

i do not believe this was true indefiantly the native americans would have lsot aganist america one they didndt have the resources and allies that america had and 2   indians werent as advanced at the time as they were not 3 americans had the expreince because some of the soliders from other wars fought in that war and were attecked etc