Why is it important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation a. events happening at the same time might have influenced one another b. every historical interpretation must consider the political and social consequences of an event. c. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. d. historical interpretations are only valid if they are written in a similar context as the event.

Explanation:

First of all, ''context'' refers to social, religious and economic variables, that's why they must be included in every social event that's being analysed, because all these variables influence one on another. For example, economy is influenced by religion due to the perception it gives it (rich are mean and poor are spiritual).

On the other hand, social behaviour and events are defined by other circumstances like religion because it was set a bunch of rules of proper human behaviour according to sacred scriptures.

So, at the end, interpreting history becomes a really difficult activity because is a multi variable science.

populist movement, in u.s. history, politically oriented coalition of agrarian reformers in the middle west and south that advocated a wide range of economic and political legislation in the late 19th century. thus in 1892 their leaders organized the populist, or people's, party, and the farmers' alliances melted away.