(30 points! ) if you're good at argumentative essays! the arms race u. s foreign policy argumentative essay. u.s. foreign policy how the united states government interacts with the world affects people across the globe. you will evaluate a specific u. s. foreign policy based on your analysis of its effectiveness and write a argumentative essay.1 state a claim regarding the effectiveness of the arms race u. s. foreign policy and provide evidence in support of your claim. 2 provide reason(s) for your claim, including an analysis of why the policy was implemented for national and/or international interests and considering two or more social science perspectives.*3 provide evidence for your claim that supports your analysis of the effects of the policy, with discussion of: how the policy affected stakeholders in the united states. how the policy provided benefits for other nations. how the policy imposed costs on other nations.4 refer explicitly in the paper to three or more credible sources that provide relevant information: cite your sources when you draw information from them: for instance, when you summarize, paraphrase refer to facts, figures, and ideas. quote, and when you or provide complete publication information for each source in your bibliography or list of works cited.

Which was not a reason for the fall of the han dynasty? neglected farmland civil war decline in trade peasant rebellions foreign invasions

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction

Brainliesttt !me : ) describe the event : increase in islamic extremis in the middle east