Which explains a case of a conflict over water rights?

a pakistani terrorist group threatens to contaminate the water supply of a major city with poison.

north korea releases the floodgates on a dam, causing flash floods that kill six south koreans.

natives of sudan have not wanted to share their limited water supply, leading to civil war and killing of thousands.

during the libyan civil war, loyalists seize a water plant and cut off the water supply to the capital.

The correct answer is C) Natives of Sudan have not wanted to share their limited water supply, leading to civil war and killing of thousands.

The statement that explains a case of a conflict over water rights is that Natives of Sudan have not wanted to share their limited water supply, leading to civil war and the killing of thousands.

This is the case of a conflict over water rights that is aggravated by the terrible famine that the country was suffering. Political conflicts, economic hardships, and climate conditions have affected Sudan so much to the degree to have a humanitarian crisis due to famine. Millions of people are in risk to die of hunger and many more had decided to emigrate to other countries.

answer: the risk-return relationship. generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. diversification enables you to reduce the risk of your portfolio without sacrificing potential returns.

explanation:

imma have to go   the third option

sorry if i am wrong hope this

if i am right plz give me brainliest