Describe briefly one case in which the supreme court upheld a restriction on symbolic speech and one case where it struck down a restriction?

Brandenburg v. Ohio US

Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech -- including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence--is protected by the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution as long as it does not indicate an imminent threat.

Explanation:

what the first or next guy says

(202 bc - 220 ad) dynasty started by lui bang; a great and long-lasting rule, it discarded the harsh policies of the qin dynasty and adopted confucian principles; han rulers chose officials who passed the civil service exams rather than birth; it was a time of prosperity