1) began to see themselves as one people and came together as one against the british.
2) was an indian nationalist who advocated for nonviolent protests. he made civil disobedience accessible for all protesters and unit people regardless of background.
3) after wwii, the united states wanted to ensure would not fall to communism. the united states invested heavily in the japanese economy to ensure economic prosperity and set up a new democratic government in the country.
was a revolutionary communist leader of china who brought the communist part to power.
was a disaster and led to massive famine throughout china.
begun by mao in 1966, sought to drive moderates from the communist party, eliminates the “four olds” (old culture, customs, habits, and ideas), and instill a spirit of permanent revolution; ended with mao’s death in 1976
7)in april 1989, over 10,000 students gathered in beijing’s protesting corruption within the communist party and asking for a move towards democracy. the chinese government denounced the protestors as anti-government and antiparty; june 4, 1989, the chinese army used live ammunition, tanks and armored personnel carriers to force their way into the square and disburse the protestors; communist party denies that the massacre happened and forbids mention of it in china; estimations place the death toll from between 300-1,000 people
8) during the cold war, the united states created a policy of which meant that no new countries or colonies would become communist.
9)the united states became involved in the and to stop the spread of communism.
pls i need

Unit 3 big question: why did north american colonists work against british rule? what kind of government did they create after they had gained independence? section 1: short-answer questions (30 points) the american colonies were divided into four geographic regions: northern, mid-atlantic, chesapeake, and southern. using a sentence or two, describe the major economy of each region. northern: mid-atlantic chesapeake: southern:

1. describe events that explain the border differences between these maps. use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. use complete sentences. 2.besides land, what did the united states gain from expansion? use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. use complete sentences. 3. people disagree whether the united states should have gone to war against mexico. should the united states have declared war? consider information from the lesson and maps to explain your claim with at least two reasons. the united states _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ because _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. a second reason is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. 4. reporter mcquill mentions your claim will be stronger if you respond well to someone who disagrees with you. use this framework to challenge a counterclaim. even though some people think that _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction