Was u. s. involvement in hawaii and cuba morally right or wrong? explain

Here is both sides to the story

Morally right

The United States was helping both of these territories to get rid of tyrannical leaders. For example, the United States helped get rid of the repressive Spanish regime that had been controlling Cuba for over a century. Along with this, the US helped to get rid of a monarchy in Hawaii in which political power was determined by family affiliation not the will of the people. Setting up democracies in these territories would help citizens to have more freedom and political power, ultimately making them better places to live.

Morally wrong

The United States government should not force their views on other territories who may not necessarily want their help. It is not the United States job to determine what type of government or economic system these territories have. It is unfair of the US to help in the overthrow of any government like we did in Hawaii.

i think it should be slowed colonial western march

abraham lincoln, according to anyone who was connected with agriculture, represented the worst of northern politicians. shortly after lincoln was elected, south carolina seceded from the union. they along with other southern states, retained their anger. in a way, it was their own fault: the democrats were split in the south. some wanted slavery to be extended in other states that were about to join the union and some didn't want it badly enough. lincoln had a solid backing from his party: the republicans were united in not wanting slavery to be expanded.