Based on the suprimacy clause, what must a judge support in the event of a legal conflict?

The Supremacy Law is established as part of the U.S Constitution in Article VI, clause 2. Basically, the Supremacy Law states that all laws, rules and regulations established within the United States, and also all policies established in alliance with other nations, come under the supreme and ultimate control of the United States Constitution and no law can be taken above it. With this clarification stated in Article VI, Clause 2, the United States was able to put under balance conflicts that had arisen in the past between state laws and state Constitutions and also rules and regulations that had been set for each state and region of the country. The Supremacy Law, then, places the U.S Constitution as the highest law under which all other laws, federal and state, are placed. In the case of a conflict, especially of the legal kind, a judge must then always guide his/her rulings with the laws set in the U.S Constitution and nothing must come outside of its framework. If this is so, then the ruling can be offset and overturned.

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.

i think it would be reparing roads