What did justice brown’s verdict in plessy v. ferguson state? it was against the law to segregate people based on race. laws permitting separation are unconstitutional. separation does not necessarily imply any inequality. desegregation was the only option to solve this court case.

C.Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality.

Separation does not necessarily imply any inequality

Explanation:

In 1892, Homer Plessy, a black man, sat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train. But Louisiana had a Separate Car Act (1890), which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites, and Plessy ended up arrested.

In the case, Plessy’s lawyer argued that the Separate Car Act violated the 13th and 14th Amendments, which established absolute equality for the races before the law.

However, the Supreme Court considered that segregation did not necessarily imply any inequality toward African Americans, and it wasn't a form of discrimination. Therefore, the doctrine of "separate but equal" was allowed to continue.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

may i see the answer choices?