What were the reasons the bomb should not have been used on japan? explain in one paragraph .

The atomic bomb should not have been used on Japan. Although it did get Japan to surrender and the war ended, it caused so much damage to Japan it was unbelievable and insane. Many Japanese citizens died from the bombing. Many others were injured or got sick. The atomic bomb destroyed much of the two cities. Even though bombing was required to end the war, the US could have dropped fire bombs which would have had a similar effect in terms of death tolls and destruction to the infrastructure.I don't agree with the bombing of Japan i understand it was for a good reason, but still i think we went a little over board. I think we should of used smaller bombs to get the point across to them.

In all honesty i really think we shouldn't have used the Bomb on Japan, Only because it killed so many people and it did so much damage. Between the two bombs that had been dropped on the Japanese cities had so much power. It was more power then all the bombs that the Allied had dropped on Europe crazy right. Many people started dying from illness of the radiation and illness caused by the bomb. Unfortunately the damages from the bomb lasted decades

its main object was the establishment of "settlement houses" in poor urban areas, in which volunteer middle-class "settlement workers" would live, hoping to share knowledge and culture with, and alleviate the poverty of, their low-income neighbors.